Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Apr;41(3):473–483. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9686-8

Table 3.

Results of Hierarchical Regressions That Examine Executive Function Predictors of the Proportion of Central Ideas Recalled, Controlling for Word Reading Ability and Gender

B SE(B) β t p
Model 1
     ADHD sx .00 .00 −.11 −1.00 .34
     Inhibition .02 .02 .16 1.44 .15
     Inhibition×ADHD sx .00 .00 .01 .12 .90
Model 2
     ADHD sx .00 .00 −.16 −1.59 .12
     WM .03 .02 .21 2.16 .03
     WM×ADHD sx .00 .00 −.05 −.54 .59
Model 3
     ADHD sx .00 .00 −.13 −1.27 .21
     Verbal PS .02 .02 .13 1.28 .20
     Verbal PS×ADHD sx .00 .00 .06 .61 .55
Model 4
     ADHD sx −.01 .00 −.23 −1.99 .05
     Motor PS .00 .02 −.01 −.04 .97
     Motor PS×ADHD sx .00 .00 −.08 −.81 .42
Model 5
     ADHD sx −.01 .00 −.23 −2.30 .02
     Verbal IQ .02 .02 .14 1.13 .26
     Verbal IQ×ADHD sx −.01 .00 −.18 −1.81 .07
Model 6
     ADHD sx −.01 .00 −.20 −2.04 .04
     Performance IQ .01 .02 .06 .59 .56
     Performance IQ×ADHD sx .00 .00 −.11 −1.16 .25

Note. WM = Working Memory, PS = Processing Speed