Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Nov 25;28(3):1255–1269. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq312

Table 4.

Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) based on haplogroup frequencies

PROPORTION OF VARIATION (%)
Number of
groups
GROUPING a total number
of
populations
AMONG
GROUPS
AMONG
POPULATIONS
WITHIN GROUP
WITHIN
POPULATIONS
1 ALL POPULATIONS 22 - 15.39** 84.61**
1 BANTU 10 - 4.69** 95.31**
5 GEOGRAPHY b 22 9.96** 6.75** 83.29**
4 LANGUAGE c 22 14.08** 8.68** 77.24**
2 Niger-Congo d 14 11.58* 5.31** 83.10**
2 Niger-Congo (low) e 14 0.28 5.67** 94.06**

All values are significant with p-value < 0.05 * and p-value < 0.01 **, except for that in boldface.

a

Pygmy groups were excluded because they are known to have undergone language shift.

b

Geographic subdivision as follows: North (Algeria); West (Senegal, Burkina Faso, Nigeria), Central (Cameroon, D.R.C., Gabon), East (Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda), South (Angola, Zambia, Botswana, Namibia, South Africa)

c

Linguistic grouping with the four major African phyla: Afro-Asiatic, “Khoisan”, Niger-Congo, and Nilo-Saharan.

d

Niger-Congo Bantu vs non-Bantu

e

Niger-Congo Bantu vs non-Bantu with a lower haplogroup resolution: E1b1a*(xE1b1a7) and E1b1a7. See main text for details.