Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Mar 12;45(5):670–676. doi: 10.1002/eat.22009

TABLE 1.

Major differences between fixed versus random effects approaches to analyzing therapist effects

Dimension Compared Approach to Analyzing Therapist Effects
Fixed Therapist Effects Random Therapist Effects
Scope of inference (i.e., the results may be generalized to…) The specific therapists in the trial The population of therapists
Assumptions about the sample of therapists in the trial None The therapists are a representative sample from a specified population
Intratherapist correlation (i.e., correlation of patient outcomes within therapists) Ignored (assumed to be zero) Estimated in the analysis (may be different from zero)
Residual variance Equal across patients (homoscedasticity) May be unequal across patients (heteroscedasticity)
Recommended minimum sample size of therapists At least two At least five