Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 10;29(3):389–390. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts697

Table 1.

Comparison of TE calls for the CEU trio for RetroSeq, Tangram (Marth group, unpublished data) and Tea (Lee et al., 2012)

RetroSeq
Tangram
Tea
Type Sample Total PCR Total PCR Total PCR
Alu NA12891 1038 0.97 1192 0.98 1127 0.92
NA12892 1046 0.98 1185 0.98 1078 0.92
NA12878 1078 0.98 1326 0.99 1038 0.89
L1 NA12891 121 0.81 190 0.81 286 0.81
NA12892 127 0.88 219 0.88 262 0.76
NA12878 174 0.82 227 0.87 168 0.84

The ‘Total’ column is the number of calls predicted by each caller and the ‘PCR’ column indicates the sensitivity of the methods relative to the PCR-validated calls from Stewart et al. (2011).