Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 17;5:294. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-294

Table 2.

Estimates for the parameters in the model describing the densities of questing larval, nymphal and adult Ixodes ricinus 2006 – 2009

Sampling locations Baseline tick density/activity Population trend Month of peak tick density/activity Tick aggregation P-value
Appelscha
1.5
1.5
6.1
2.7
<0.01
Bilthoven
3.4
0.0
6.7
1.4
0.07
Ede
45.0
11.9
6.4
1.1
0.05
Eijsden
10.7
0.0
6.1
1.1
0.08
Gieten
5.5
18.4
6.2
0.5
<0.01
Hoog Baarlo
67.4
−11.4
6.6
1.1
<0.01
Kwade hoek
3.5
0.0
6.4
0.4
1.00
Montferland
25.2
0.0
6.7
0.4
0.09
Schiermonnikoog
1.5
3.4
6.8
0.5
0.02
Twiske
22.0
0.0
6.0
0.7
0.30
Vaals
10.0
0.0
6.5
0.2
0.64
Veldhoven
32.8
0.0
6.7
0.7
0.11
Wassenaar 0.0 6.2 5.8 0.4 <0.01

Increasing trends are indicated by positive estimates for the coefficient b in the linear function (Experimental procedures), decreasing trends by negative estimates. Baseline is equal to the intercept a in the linear function describing the tick density/activity per drag area. Population trend is the change in tick density/activity per year; it is equal to the coefficient b in the linear function multiplied by 2π. Peak month is equal to the parameter τ in the cosine function describing the annual seasonality. Tick aggregation is equal to the parameter k in the negative binomial distribution. Estimates are maximum likelihood estimates for each sampling location. Study sites with significant trends are shown in bold.