Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 15;11(24):4650–4660. doi: 10.4161/cc.22916

graphic file with name cc-11-4650-g4.jpg

Figure 4. The level of kinetochore recruitment of Cdc20 is not affected by reduction of the Mps1 in aldB4–2 mutant. (A) Spinning disk confocal time-lapse images show GFP-Cdc20 localization patterns in third instar larvae neuroblasts from wild-type (gfp-cdc20; ald+, top panel) or Mps1 mutant (gfp-cdc20; aldB4–2, bottom panel). Arrows indicate kinetochore-associated GFP-Cdc20 signals. Arrowheads indicate the prophase nucleus just before NEB (nuclear envelope breakdown, Image at 00:00 time point) or the early interphase nucleus (Image at 26:00 time point) where GFP-Cdc20 was excluded from the nucleus. Bar = 2μm. (B) GFP-Cdc20 fluorescent intensities at prometaphase kinetochores (selected regions a and c) were quantified and compared after subtraction of the relevant cytoplasmic backgrounds (selected regions b and d). Spinning disk confocal images displaying the peak levels of the GFP-Cdc20 at the prometaphase kinetochores were taken from either the wild-type (gfp-cdc20; ald+, left) or the Mps1 mutant (gfp-cdc20; aldB4–2, right). Bar = 3 μm. (C) The graph shows the quantification results. There is no significant different between the highest intensities of the GFP-Cdc20 recruited at prometaphase kinetochores in Mps1 mutant (gfp-cdc20; aldB4–2) and in the wild-type (gfp-cdc20; ald+) neuroblasts. Twenty individual neuroblast images from each fly line were used for this quantification. Time, minutes, seconds.