Table 1.
Class Comparisons of Three-Dimensional Microdissected Intratumor Subregions
Comparison | Comparison definition∗ | Differentially expressed genes (No.) |
|
---|---|---|---|
P < 0.001 | Fold change ≥2 | ||
X-Y dimension | |||
A1 | T1-1 vs T1-2 at level A | 24 | 1 |
A2 | (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T2 at level A | 10 | 0 |
A3 | (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T3 at level A | 5 | 0 |
A4 | T2 vs T3 at level A | 3 | 0 |
C1 | T1-1 vs T1-2 at level C | 2 | 0 |
C2 | (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T2 at level C | 30 | 0 |
C3 | (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T3 at level C | 33 | 0 |
C4 | T2 vs T3 at level C | 21 | 0 |
AC1 | T1-1 vs T1-2 across level A and B | 7 | 0 |
AC2 | (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T2 across level A and B | 19 | 0 |
AC3 | (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T3 across level A and B | 24 | 0 |
AC4 | T2 vs T3 across level A and B | 10 | 0 |
Z dimension | |||
V1.1 | T1-1 at level A vs T1-1 at level C | 32 | 2 |
V1.2 | T1-2 at level A vs T1-2 at level C | 10 | 0 |
V2 | T2 at level A vs T2 at level C | 54 | 4 |
V3 | T3 at level A vs T3 at level C | 27 | 0 |
Overall difference between level A and level C | 93 | 0 |
Tumor subregions (T) and levels (A–C) are as shown in Figure 1B.