Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;182(2):529–539. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.10.028

Table 1.

Class Comparisons of Three-Dimensional Microdissected Intratumor Subregions

Comparison Comparison definition Differentially expressed genes (No.)
P < 0.001 Fold change ≥2
X-Y dimension
 A1 T1-1 vs T1-2 at level A 24 1
 A2 (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T2 at level A 10 0
 A3 (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T3 at level A 5 0
 A4 T2 vs T3 at level A 3 0
 C1 T1-1 vs T1-2 at level C 2 0
 C2 (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T2 at level C 30 0
 C3 (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T3 at level C 33 0
 C4 T2 vs T3 at level C 21 0
 AC1 T1-1 vs T1-2 across level A and B 7 0
 AC2 (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T2 across level A and B 19 0
 AC3 (T1-1 + T1-2) vs T3 across level A and B 24 0
 AC4 T2 vs T3 across level A and B 10 0
Z dimension
 V1.1 T1-1 at level A vs T1-1 at level C 32 2
 V1.2 T1-2 at level A vs T1-2 at level C 10 0
 V2 T2 at level A vs T2 at level C 54 4
 V3 T3 at level A vs T3 at level C 27 0
Overall difference between level A and level C 93 0

Tumor subregions (T) and levels (A–C) are as shown in Figure 1B.