Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Mar 26;20(10):2133–2141. doi: 10.1038/oby.2012.75

Table 2.

In vivo data for pgDIO and pgDR rats

pgDR chow pgDR HE pgDIO chow pgDIO HE Interaction Genotype Diet
Average daily body weight gain (g) 4.7 ± 0.14*** 5.3 ± 0.14### 6.8 ± 0.16 7.5 ± 0.32 P = 0.90 P < 0.0001 P = 0.004
Body weight at termination (g) 382.3 ± 10.1*** 420.3 ± 9.7### 510.1 ± 11.4 552.4 ± 19.7 P = 0.87 P < 0.0001 P = 0.005
Average daily food intake (kcal) 86.1 ± 2.3*** 92.8 ± 2.7## 109.0 ± 2.9 107.7 ± 4.1 P = 0.20 P < 0.0001 P = 0.37
Fat pad weight/body weight (%) 3.95 ± 0.3* 4.8 ± 0.6### 6.6 ± 0.7§§§ 10.5 ± 0.8 P = 0.02 P < 0.0001 P = 0.0009

Data tested with two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni-corrected post-tests, n = 8 per group.

HE, high energy; pgDIO, polygenic diet-induced obese; pgDR, polygenic diet-resistant.

*

P < 0.05.

***

P < 0.001 between pgDR chow and pgDIO chow.

##

P < 0.01.

###

P < 0.001 between pgDR HE and pgDIO HE.

§§§

P < 0.001 between pgDIO chow and pgDIO HE.