Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Vasc Med. 2012 Mar 8;17(2):85–93. doi: 10.1177/1358863X11436195

Table 2b.

Hazard Ratios (95% confidence intervals) of developing clinical PAD according to quartile of homeostatic model of insulin resistance

HOMA-IR
quartile
Cases Adjusted for age, race,
gender, cohort and field
center
Multivariable
Model Aa
Multivariable
Model Bb
1 10 1.0 1.0 1.0
2 18 0.87 (0.40-1.88) 0.91 (0.41-1.99) 0.84 (0.38-1.85)
3 41 1.23 (0.61-2.46) 1.18 (0.58-2.41) 0.96 (0.46-1.97),
4 88 2.14 (1.11-4.14) 2.30 (1.15-4.58) 1.62 (0.80-3.30)
p for linear
trend
<0.001 <0.001 0.007
a

additionally adjusted for potential confounders, including smoking status (never, former, current), alcohol consumption, exercise intensity, body mass index

b

adjusted for covariates in model-A plus potential causal intermediary factors, including blood pressure category (normotensive, prehypertensive or hypertensive), LDL/HDL ratio, use of lipid-lowering medications, estimated glomerular filtration rate using cystatin C, known cardiovascular disease, and known cerebrovascular disease