Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 15;18(1):1430–1436. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2012.00332

Table 1.

Results of baseline quantitative sensory testing.

ARA 290* Placebo


Variable Nerve fibers involved Change Number of patients (%) Change Number of patients (%)
Cold detection threshold Aδ and C Decrease 7 (64) Decrease 9 (90)
Warm detection threshold Aδ and C Decrease 7 (64) Decrease 6 (60)
Thermal sensory limen Aδ and C Decrease 3 (27) Decreased, increased 2 (20), 1 (10)
Paradoxical heat sensation Decrease 1 (9) 0
Cold pain threshold Aδ and C 0 Increase 1 (10)
Heat pain threshold C Decrease, increase 2 (18), 1 (9) Decrease, increase 1 (10), 2 (20)
Mechanical detection threshold Decrease, increase 2 (18), 1 (9) Decrease 1 (10)
Mechanical pain threshold Decrease 2 (18) Decrease 3 (30)
Mechanical pain sensitivity Aβ + C Decrease 1 (9) Increase 2 (20)
Dynamic mechanical allodynia Increase 1 (9) Increase 4 (40)
Windup ratio Aδ and C 0 Increase 1 (10)
Vibration detection threshold Decrease 6 (55) Decrease 6 (60)
Pressure pain threshold Aδ and C Increase 2 (18) Increase 8 (80)
*

One patient in the ARA 290 treatment arm refused QST. Patients in both treatment groups showed functional impairment in the function of both small fibers (Aδ and C) as well as larger sensory fibers (Aβ). Data are expressed as either increased or decreased function in those patients deviating 2 or more standard deviations from measurements obtained from a normal population.