Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 13;471(3):784–791. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2575-1

Table 2.

Race stratified for the major prognostic factors studied in this article*

Factor Race
East Asian Black White Others
No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
Sex
 Female 33 (46) 53 (40) 331 (45) 18 (34)
 Male 39 (54) 80 (60) 411 (55) 35 (66)
Age (years)
 1–10 14 (19) 27 (20) 124 (17) 7 (13)
 11–20 50 (69) 87 (65) 486 (65) 40 (76)
 21–30 8 (11) 19 (14) 132 (18) 6 (11)
Venue
 Good results 70 (97) 91 (68) 583 (79) 39 (74)
 Bad results 2 (3) 42 (32) 159 (21) 14 (26)
Decade
 1973–1980 11 (15) 32 (24) 188 (25) 16 (30)
 1981–1990 22 (31) 49 (37) 236 (32) 14 (26)
 1991–2000 39 (54) 52 (39) 318 (43) 23 (43)
Grade
 Low 2 (6) 4 (7) 43 (15) 2 (9)
 High 31 (94) 52 (93) 244 (85) 20 (91)
Histology
 Small cell 1 (1) 0 (0) 3 (0) 0 (0)
 Telangiectatic 4 (6) 4 (3) 21 (3) 0 (0)
 Fibroblastic 3 (4) 8 (6) 35 (5) 2 (4)
 Chondroblastic 8 (11) 13 (10) 69 (9) 6 (11)
 Not otherwise specified 56 (78) 108 (81) 614 (83) 45 (85)
Site
 Upper limb 10 (14) 18 (14) 97 (13) 4 (8)
 Lower limb 62 (86) 115 (86) 645 (87) 49 (92)
Surgery
 Wide excision 7 (25) 7 (17) 40 (19) 3 (17)
 Radical resection 15 (54) 20 (48) 106 (50) 9 (50)
 Amputation 5 (18) 13 (31) 61 (29) 4 (22)
 Major amputation 1 (4) 2 (5) 7 (3) 2 (11)
Compartmentalization
 Intracompartmental 14 (38) 20 (38) 72 (28) 6 (43)
 Extracompartmental 23 (62) 33 (62) 183 (72) 8 (57)
Size
 8 cm or less 17 (77) 13 (39) 94 (53) 7 (54)
 More than 8 cm 5 (23) 20 (61) 82 (47) 6 (46)
Number of primaries
 Single 70 (97) 124 (93) 728 (98) 50 (94)
 Multiple 2 (3) 9 (7) 14 (2) 3 (6)

* There were relatively more East Asian patients treated in the 1990s who had limb-preserving surgery for small tumors in states with standard survival results (underlined) that could have accounted for their better performance.