Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 21;471(3):883–890. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2589-8

Table 3.

Recent publications involving diffuse PVNS of the knee are compared with regard to study design, patient treatment, and outcome measures such as recurrence, arthritic progression, and complications

Author Year Technique Patients Adjuvant radiotherapy Recurrence rate Arthritic progression Progression to arthroplasty Complications Followup (years)
De Ponti et al. [5] 2003 All- arthroscopic 7 No 20% NR NR None 5.0
    All-arthroscopic 8 No 75% NR NR None  
Ogilvie-Harris et al. [14] 1992 All-arthroscopic 11 No 9% 16% 10% NR 4.5
    All-arthroscopic 9 No 56%     NR  
Zvijac et al. [21] 1999 All- arthroscopic 12 No 14% NR NR 8% stiffness requiring MUA 3.5
Flandry et al. [6] 1994 Open/open 25 No 8% 48% NR 32% stiffness requiring MUA 4.8
Chin et al. [3] 2002 Open/open 40 75% 18%   10% 8% stiffness requiring MUA; 3% CRPS, 10% superficial wound infection 5.0
Sharma and Cheng [19] 2009 Open/open 16 No 19% NR NR NR 6.2
Open/arthroscopic 8 No 25% NR NR NR
    All-arthroscopic* 13 No 92% NR NR NR  
Current study 2012 Open/open 11 No 64% 0% 0% 9% superficial wound infection 3.3
Open/arthroscopic 11 No 9% 9% 0% 9% hemarthrosis, 9% stiffness requiring MUA
All-arthroscopic* 26 No 62% 23% 15% 8% hemarthrosis, 4% DVT

* Portions had subtotal synovectomy; all had subtotal synovectomy; all patients were revision synovectomy cases; PVNS = pigmented villonodular synovitis; NR = not reported; MUA = manipulation under anesthesia; CRPS = chronic regional pain syndrome; DVT = deep venous thrombosis.