Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 22;471(3):803–813. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2555-5

Table 4.

Functional results for distal radius reconstruction in recent literature

Authors Reconstruction Number Mean followup ISOLS-MSTS MSTS Mean DASH Flexion/extension Pro-/supination Grip (percent contralateral side)
Scoccianti et al., 2010 [26] Osteoarticular allograft 17 5 years 86% (range, 63–97) NA NA 56/58 80/84
Saini et al., 2011 [25] Ipsilateral fibula arthrodesis 12 6 years 91% (range, 77–93) NA NA 42/31 37/52 71 (range, 42–86)
Jaminet et al., 2012 [15] Fibuloscapholunate arthrodesis 3 6–60 months NA NA NA 33/13 67/56 73 (range, 70–80)
van Isacker et al., 2011 [29] Osteoarticular allograft 5 14 years (range, 5–19) 62 (range, 50–74) 18.6 (range, 13–22) NA NA NA NA
Peng-Fei and Yu-Hua, 2011 [23] Vascularised fibular graft joint reconstruction 18 NA NA 26 (range, 21–29) NA 33/67 34/13 75%
Puloski et al., 2007 [24] Arthrodesis after resection 21 NA NA 27 (range, 23–31) 20 (5–35) 0/0 76/68 75%
Szabo et al., 2006 [28] Osteoarticular allograft + Sauve-Kapandji 9 100 months (range, 39–219) 75% (range, 40–90) NA 15 (2–41) 50/52 80/67 77%
Bianchi et al., 2005 [4] Osteoarticular allograft 12 52 months (range, 26–145) NA NA NA 514/37 NA NA
Current study Tibia cortical strut autograft arthrodesis 9 8.9 years (range, 3–20) 75% (range, 40–90) 23 (range, 12–27) 14.3 (0–55) 0/0 78/50 72

ISOLS = International Society of Limb Salvage; MSTS = Musculoskeletal Tumor Society; DASH = Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; NA = not applicable.