Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2012 Dec 4;111(4):540–546. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.039

Table 4.

Sensitivity analysis - Cox proportional hazards models of snoring and incident cardiovascular disease among Women’s Health Initiative participants using inverse probability weighting (N=42,244)§

Snoring frequency Model adjusted for age, race Model fully adjusted
Cases Person-yrs HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value

CHD* Frequent 609 86,227 1.59 1.42, 1.78 <0.001 1.16 1.03, 1.30 0.018
Occasional 814 143,209 1.28 1.16, 1.42 <0.001 1.12 1.00, 1.24 0.043
None (referent) 978 208,454 1.00 REF REF 1.00 REF REF

CVD Frequent 790 84,671 1.49 1.35, 1.65 <0.001 1.13 1.02, 1.25 0.018
Occasional 1103 141,122 1.26 1.15, 1.38 <0.001 1.12 1.02, 1.23 0.026
None (referent) 1354 205,547 1.00 REF REF 1.00 REF REF

Stroke Frequent 232 95,307 1.37 1.15, 1.64 0.001 1.21 1.03, 1.43 0.020
Occasional 349 153,389 1.30 1.11, 1.52 0.002 1.14 0.94, 1.37 0.178
None (referent) 412 220,697 1.00 REF REF 1.00 REF REF
*

CHD outcome includes MI, CHD death, PTCA, CABG, or hospitalized angina

CVD outcome includes MI, CHD death, PTCA, CABG, hospitalized angina, or ischemic stroke

Model adjusted for age, race, education, income, smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, depression, diabetes, high blood pressure, BMI, WHR, hyperlipidemia

§

All analyses conducted among disease-free cohort and total N’s reflect this difference by outcome