Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 24;10(1):72–84. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10010072

Table 1.

Antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from faecal samples of dogs detected by the disk diffusion method.

Antibiotic No. resistant (% resistant) No. ( % resistant )
E. faecium (n = 45) E. gallinarum * (n = 17) E. casseliflavus * (n = 4) E. raffinosus (n = 2) E. faecalis (n = 1) E. avium (n = 2) E. durans/hirae (n = 2)
Clindamycin n = 63 (86.3%) 38 (84.4) 15 (88.23) 4 (100) 2 (100) 1 (100) 2 (100) 1 (50)
Tetracycline n = 48 (65.7%) 33 (73.3) 10 (58.9) 2 (50) 2 (100) 1 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Erythromycin n = 44 (60.27%) 35 (77.7) 4 (23.52) 2 (50) 1 (50) 1 (100) 0 (0) 1 (50)
Ampicillin n = 35 (47.9%) 30 (66.6) 2 (11.8) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (100) 0 (0) 2 (100)
Penicillin n = 34 (46.6%) 33 (73.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (50)
Piperacillin-Tazobactam n = 32 (43.8%) 30 (66.6) 1 (5.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (50)
Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid n = 25 (34.2%) 23 (51.1) 1 (5.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (50)
Levofloxacin n = 17 (23.3%) 15 (33.3) 1 (5.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (50)
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole n = 7 (9.6%) 3 (6.6) 2 (11.8) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (100)
Chloramphenicol n = 1 (1.4%) 0 (0) 1 (5.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

* These species was susceptible by the disk diffusion method but showed a MIC of 6–12 mg/L when tested by the E-test.