Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 5;10(2):e1001376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001376

Table 10. Likelihood of receipt of radiotherapy by SEP group (non-universal health care systems).

Study No. Receiving Radio Cohort No./No. Eligible Rate Stage Histology OR/rate in Q1 (95% CI) OR/rate in Q2 (95% CI) OR/rate in Q3 (95% CI) OR/rate in Q4 (95% CI) OR/rate in Q5 (95% CI) P value Quality Score Meta-analysis Further information
Bradley et al, 2008 [57] 950 2348 40.46 I,II,IIIa NSCLC 1.00 0.97 (0.79 to 1.19) >0.05 4 Y
Ou et al, 2008 [70] 2779 19700 14.11 I NSCLC 11.7 12.6 14.7 16.5 16.6 <0.001 2 N Univariable analysis
Smith et al, 1995 [66] 1323 2813 47.03 local NSCLC 0.95 (0.83 to 1.09) >0.001 5 N
Hardy et al, 2009 [62] 43519 51243 84.93 III,IV NSCLC 1.00 1.01 (0.96 to 1.07) 0.93 (0.88 to 0.99) 0.88 (0.82 to 0.93) 0.05, <0.05, <0.05 5 Y Individual p-values reported
Hayman et al, 2007 [63] 6436 11084 58.07 IV NSCLC 1.48 (1.17 to 1.87) 1.50 (1.17 to 1.91) 1.32 (1.01 to 1.72) 1.25 (0.93 to 1.69) 1.00 <0.001 5 Y(S)
Smith et al, 1995 [66] 1438 2396 60.02 distant NSCLC 1.00 (0.90 to 1.12) >0.001 5 N
Yang et al, 2010 [74] NR NR ?? any 32.0 32.1 31.4 33.1 0.02 2 N Univariable analysis

Some studies reported SEP quintiles but others reported SEP in 2, 3, or 4 categories or as a continuous variable. Details of the number of SEP groups per study are given in Tables 14 in the column entitled “No. of SEP groups.” Quality scores range from 1 (lowest quality) to 6 (highest quality). Meta-analysis: Y, included in final meta-analysis; Y(S), included in sensitivity meta-analysis; N, not included in meta-analysis. Q1, high socioeconomic position; Q5, low socioeconomic position.

CI, confidence interval; non-UHCS, non-universal health care system; NR, not reported; OR, odds ratio; pop, population; SE, standard error; SEP, socioeconomic position.