Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 5;10(2):e1001376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001376

Table 12. Likelihood of receipt of any type of unspecified treatment by SEP group (non-universal health care systems).

Study No. Receiving Treatment Cohort No./No. Eligible Rate Histology OR/Rate in Q1 (95% CI) OR/Rate in Q2 (95% CI) OR/Rate in Q3 (95% CI) OR/Rate in Q4 (95% CI) OR/Rate in Q5 (95% CI) p-Value Quality Score Meta-Analysis Further Information
Ou et al, 2008 [70] 18216 19700 92.47 NSCLC 94.7 94.1 92.2 91.9 87.2 <0.001 2 N Stage I. Univariable analysis
Smith et al, 1995 [66] 1697 2396 70.83 NSCLC 1.00 (0.91 to 1.11) >0.001 5 N Distant stage
Smith et al, 1995 [66] 2343 2813 83.29 NSCLC 1.00 (0.88 to 1.13) >0.001 5 N Local stage

Some studies reported SEP quintiles but others reported SEP in 2, 3, or 4 categories or as a continuous variable. Details of the number of SEP groups per study are given in Tables 14 in the column entitled “No. of SEP groups.” Quality scores range from 1 (lowest quality) to 6 (highest quality). Meta-analysis: Y, included in final meta-analysis; Y(S), included in sensitivity meta-analysis; N, not included in meta-analysis. Q1, high socioeconomic position; Q5, low socioeconomic position.

CI, confidence interval; non-UHCS, non-universal health care system; NR, not reported; OR, odds ratio; pop, population; SE, standard error; SEP, socioeconomic position.