Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 12;2:3. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-3

Table 4.

Motivational interviewing (single) (MI-S) versus hepatitis health promotion (HHP)

Outcome or subgroup Studies Participants Statistical method Effect estimate
4.1 Continuous outcomes
 
 
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)
Subtotals only
4.1.1 Alcohol use as number of standard drinks consumed per day over the last 30 days
1
155
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)
−0.10 [-1.89, 1.69]
4.1.2 Illicit drug use as frequency of drug use (as measured by Addiction Severity Index - ASI drug)
1
155
Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)
0.00 [-0.03, 0.03]
4.1.3 Illicit drug use as a composite drug score (frequency/severity for all drugs taken)
1
157
Mean Difference(IV, Fixed, 95% CI)
−0.10 [-0.46, 0.26]
4.2 Dichotomous outcomes
 
 
Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)
Subtotals only
4.2.1 Alcohol use as greater than 50% reduction in number of standard drinks consumed per day over the last 30 days
1
177
Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)
0.92 [0.68, 1.26]
4.2.2 Alcohol abstinence as abstinence from alcohol over the last 30 days 1 177 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.56, 1.67]