Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 1;3(2):263–272. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.005066

Table 2. Prediction accuracy with QP and GWP using SE and ME models in CV1 and CV2 for traits LL and LW based on 25 NAM population.

LL
LW
SE
ME
SE
ME
Scheme Approach Envi QPa GWPb QPc GWPd QPa GWPb QPc GWPd
CV1 WP E1 0.20 (2.2) 0.38 (0.93) 0.17 (2.4, −0.10) 0.42 (1.40, 0.10) 0.19 (2.2) 0.40 (1.11) 0.20 (2.6, 0.06) 0.46 (1.29, 0.15)
E2 0.19 (2.4) 0.41 (1.15) 0.17 (2.4, −0.12) 0.44 (1.60, 0.06) 0.24 (2.4) 0.46 (0.92) 0.23 (2.6, −0.05) 0.49 (1.18, 0.08)
E3 0.17 (2.1) 0.38 (1.24) 0.16 (2.4, −0.04) 0.42 (1.57, 0.10) 0.15 (2.0) 0.37 (1.40) 0.18 (2.6, 0.18) 0.43 (1.37, 0.16)
E4 0.16 (2.0) 0.37 (1.27) 0.16 (2.4, 0.00) 0.41 (1.64, 0.10) 0.27 (2.7) 0.48 (0.78) 0.24 (2.6, −0.10) 0.52 (1.15, 0.08)
Mean 0.18 (2.2) 0.39 (1.00) 0.17 (2.4, −0.05) 0.42 (1.47, 0.08) 0.21 (2.3) 0.43 (1.05) 0.21 (2.6, 0.00) 0.48 (1.29, 0.12)
AP E1 0.27 (10.4) 0.31 (0.15) 0.29 (14.0, 0.09) 0.31 (0.07, 0.00) 0.32 (13.0) 0.36 (0.13) 0.34 (12.1, 0.08) 0.37 (0.09, 0.04)
E2 0.28 (13.1) 0.32 (0.14) 0.29 (14.0, 0.01) 0.33 (0.14, 0.01) 0.37 (12.8) 0.42 (0.14) 0.39 (12.1, 0.06) 0.43 (0.10, 0.02)
E3 0.24 (12.8) 0.29 (0.21) 0.25 (14.0, 0.04) 0.30 (0.20, 0.01) 0.30 (10.3) 0.34 (0.13) 0.32 (12.1, 0.09) 0.35 (0.09, 0.03)
E4 0.25 (14.0) 0.30 (0.20) 0.23 (14.0, −0.07) 0.30 (0.30, 0.00) 0.38 (12.7) 0.42 (0.11) 0.39 (12.1, 0.03) 0.43 (0.10, 0.01)
Mean 0.26 (12.6) 0.31 (0.19) 0.27 (14.0, 0.04) 0.32 (0.19, 0.03) 0.34 (12.2) 0.39 (0.15) 0.36 (12.1. 0.06) 0.40 (0.11, 0.03)
CV2 WP E1 0.20 (2.1) 0.39 (0.98) 0.24 (1.8, 0.25) 0.53 (1.19, 0.38) 0.19 (2.2) 0.41 (1.14) 0.27 (2.0, 0.42) 0.55 (1.05, 0.36)
E2 0.20 (2.3) 0.41 (1.10) 0.24 (1.8, 0.23) 0.56 (1.30, 0.35) 0.24 (2.5) 0.46 (0.92) 0.31 (2.0, 0.28) 0.59 (0.91, 0.27)
E3 0.18 (2.0) 0.38 (1.17) 0.23 (1.8, 0.33) 0.52 (1.24, 0.37) 0.16 (2.0) 0.37 (1.36) 0.25 (2.0, 0.63) 0.52 (1.03, 0.40)
E4 0.16 (2.0) 0.38 (1.38) 0.24 (1.8, 0.49) 0.53 (1.23, 0.39) 0.27 (2.7) 0.48 (0.78) 0.32 (2.0, 0.18) 0.61 (0.93, 0.28)
Mean 0.19 (2.1) 0.39 (1.05) 0.24 (1.8, 0.26) 0.54 (1.30, 0.40) 0.22 (2.4) 0.43 (0.95) 0.29 (2.0, 0.32) 0.57 (0.96, 0.33)
AP E1 0.27 (8.0) 0.32 (0.19) 0.29 (9.5, 0.09) 0.36 (0.24, 0.12) 0.31 (8.5) 0.36 (0.16) 0.35 (11.1, 0.13) 0.40 (0.14, 0.10)
E2 0.28 (9.8) 0.34 (0.21) 0.30 (9.5, 0.05) 0.37 (0.23, 0.10) 0.38 (10.6) 0.43 (0.13) 0.40 (11.1, 0.06) 0.46 (0.15, 0.07)
E3 0.23 (7.8) 0.31 (0.35) 0.26 (9.5, 0.13) 0.35 (0.35, 0.12) 0.30 (7.3) 0.35 (0.17) 0.33 (11.1, 0.12) 0.38 (0.15, 0.09)
E4 0.23 (7.4) 0.31 (0.35) 0.26 (9.5, 0.15) 0.35 (0.35, 0.12) 0.39 (11.0) 0.43 (0.10) 0.41 (11.1, 0.04) 0.46 (0.12, 0.07)
Mean 0.25 (8.3) 0.32 (0.14) 0.28 (9.5, 0.12) 0.36 (0.29, 0.13) 0.35 (9.4) 0.39 (0.11) 0.37 (11.1, 0.06) 0.43 (0.16, 0.10)

QP, quantitative trait loci-based prediction; GWP, genome-wide prediction; SE, single environment; ME, multienvironment; LL, leaf length; LW, leaf width; NAM, nested association mapping; Envi, environment; WP, within population; AP, across population.

a

In parentheses is the number of QTL identified by QP based on the SE model.

b

In parentheses is the gain in prediction accuracy with GWP over QP based on the SE model.

c

The first value in parentheses is the number of QTL identified by QP based on the ME model; and the second one the gain with ME over SE for QP.

d

The first value in parentheses is the gain in accuracy with GWP over QP based on the ME model; and the second one is the gain in accuracy with ME over SE using GWP.