. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2012 Oct 15;27(4):801–816. doi: 10.1037/a0030174

Table 2.

Repeated-measure ANOVA results for each of the four sets separately in Experiments 1 and 2.

		Set 1			Set 2			Set 3			Set 4
	df	F	p	η²_p	F	p	η²_p	F	p	η²_p	F	p	η²_p
Experiment 1; N = 76
Between-Subject Effects
Age Group	1, 74	4.37	.04^*	.06	7.31	<.01^*	.09	1.24	.27	.02	.35	.56	.01
Within-Subject Effects
Choice Pair	9, 66	2.41	.02^*	.25	6.19	<.01^*	.46	9.16	<.01^*	.56	26.28	<.01^*	.78
Age Group × Choice Pair	9, 66	.62	.78	.08	1.67	.12	.19	.39	.93	.05	2.00	.053	.21
Experiment 2; N = 96
Between-Subject Effects
Age Group	1, 92	6.35	.01^*	.07	6.70	.01^*	.07	1.33	.25	.01	.48	.49	.01
Stress	1, 92	1.59	.21	.02	1.20	.28	.01	2.71	.10	.03	2.26	.14	.02
Age Group × Stress	1, 92	1.59	.21	.02	1.02	.32	.01	.33	.57	.004	.02	.90	.0001
Within-Subject Effects
Choice Pair	9, 84	1.91	.06	.17	6.94	<.01^*	.43	2.58	.01^*	.22	2.99	<.01^*	.24
Age Group × Choice Pair	9, 84	1.45	.18	.13	1.78	.08	.16	.91	.52	.09	1.16	.33	.11
Stress × Choice Pair	9, 84	1.19	.31	.11	.88	.55	.09	1.50	.16	.14	.40	.93	.04
Age Group × Stress × Choice Pair	9, 84	.80	.62	.08	.73	.68	.07	.39	.94	.04	.38	.94	.04

indicates significant effect (p < .05). df = degrees of freedom; F= F value; p = p value; η²_p = partial Eta squared