Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2012 Oct 15;27(4):801–816. doi: 10.1037/a0030174

Table 7.

The proportion of younger and older adults who selected the risky vs. sure option or riskier of two risky options (i.e. the non-50% option) from each choice pair in Experiment 4.

Set 1: Equal-EV Sure-Loss Set Set 2: Equal-EV Sure-Gain Set
Risky Option (vs. Sure Option of −/+ $1, EV = −/+ $1)
   Odds 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30%
   Possible G/L −2 −2.22 −2.50 −2.86 −3.33 2 2.22 2.50 2.86 3.33

Proportion of Adults Who Selected Risky Option
Younger Adults .63 .53 .46 .67 .65 .33 .36 .36 .24 .30
Older Adults .82 .70 .58 .70 .68 .22 .44 .30 .24 .28

Set 3: Equal EV Risky-Loss Set Set 4: Equal EV Risky-Gain Set

Riskier Non-50% Option (vs. 50% Option of −/+ $2, EV = −/+ $1)
   Odds 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25%
   Possible G/L −2.22 −2.50 −2.86 −3.33 −4.00 2.22 2.50 2.86 3.33 4.00

Proportion of Adults Who Selected Risky Option
Younger Adults .56 .56 .75 .58 .51 .33 .28 .19 .24 .38
Older Adults .56 .52 .58 .58 .46 .30 .30 .22 .34 .40