Table 1.
Demographic and clinical data of all participants
| Sex | Age (yrs) | Education (yrs) | Time post-lesion (weeks) | Lesion etiology | Lesion site | Affected blood vessel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neglect group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| R.E. |
Female |
71 |
8 |
4 |
IS |
RH |
MCA |
| L.A. |
Male |
55 |
13 |
6 |
HS (BGH) |
RH |
MCA |
| R.A. |
Female |
63 |
8 |
5 |
HS (IP) |
RH |
MCA |
| K.W. |
Male |
49 |
13 |
6 |
IS |
RH |
MCA |
| P.A. |
Male |
70 |
11 |
13 |
IS |
RH |
MCA |
| F.J. |
Male |
54 |
11 |
7 |
HS (BGH) |
RH |
MCA |
| Patient control group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| C.K. |
Female |
68 |
7 |
6 |
IS |
RH |
MCA |
| S.G. |
Male |
55 |
13 |
10 |
IS |
RH |
MCA |
| G.G. |
Female |
66 |
10 |
15 |
IS |
RH |
MCA |
| J.G. |
Male |
52 |
17 |
38 |
IS |
RH |
MCA |
| F.E. |
Male |
68 |
17 |
11 |
HS |
RH |
SDH |
| P.T. |
Male |
54 |
12 |
5 |
IS |
RH |
MCA |
| Healthy control group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| L.I. |
Female |
72 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
| L.J. |
Male |
56 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
| D.M. |
Female |
60 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
| S.P. |
Male |
51 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
| L.G. |
Male |
71 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
| R.W. | Male | 56 | 12 | ||||
RH - right hemisphere; IS - ischemic stroke; HS - hemorrhagic stroke; SDH - subdural hemorrhage; IP – intraparietal; MCA - middle cerebral artery; BGH - basal ganglia hemorrhage.
Please note that there are no significant differences for demographical and clinical variables. The neglect patient group does not differ from the control patient group regarding age [t(5) = 0.04; p = .97], education [t(5) = 1.14; p = .31] or time post-lesion [t(5) = 1.53; p = .19]. Equally, the neglect patient group does not differ from the healthy controls regarding age [t(5) = 0.13; p = .90] or education [t(5) < 0.01; p = 1]. Consequently, there is also no difference between the two control groups as regards age [t(5) = 0.11; p = .92] and education [t(5) = 1.24; p = .27].