Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 6;8(2):e55519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055519

Table 3. Type I errors for the 3 Models in the 4 Tuscan samples.

Simulated Model
CASENTINO
MOD 1 MOD 2 MOD 3 Type I error
MOD 1 0.98 0.00 0.02 0.02
MOD 2 0.01 0.99 0.00 0.01
MOD 3 0.02 0.00 0.98 0.02
MURLO
MOD 1 MOD 2 MOD 3 Type I error
MOD 1 0.95 0.01 0.04 0.05
MOD 2 0.02 0.98 0.00 0.02
MOD 3 0.07 0.00 0.93 0.07
VOLTERRA
MOD 1 MOD 2 MOD 3 Type I error
MOD 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MOD 2 0.07 0.93 0.00 0.07
MOD 3 0.05 0.00 0.95 0.05
FLORENCE
MOD 1 MOD 2 MOD 3 Type I error
MOD 1 0.92 0.03 0.05 0.08
MOD 2 0.04 0.95 0.01 0.05
MOD 3 0.05 0.01 0.94 0.06

For each of the modern populations listed on the Y axis, data were simulated according to three models and attributed by the LR procedure to one of the models on the X-axis. The power of the procedure in recovering the correct model is represented by the rates of correct attribution (along the main diagonal; shaded cells); the last column (Type I error) represents the fraction of cases in which the correct model was not identified.