Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 6;8(2):e46572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046572

Table 5. The ten-fold cross-validation performance of metal binding sites on Cross-Validation dataset.

ETMB-RBF with different features True Positive False Positive True Negative False Negative Sensitivity Precision Specificity Accuracy MCC
Metal binding cysteine
AA 60 22 90 19 75.9% 73.2% 80.4% 78.5% 0.56
BLOSUM62 65 12 100 14 82.3% 84.4% 89.3% 86.4% 0.72
PAM250 58 9 103 21 73.4% 86.8% 92.0% 84.3% 0.67
PSSM 76 16 96 3 96.2% 82.6% 85.7% 90.1% 0.81
PSSM+SAAPs 78 12 100 1 98.7% 86.7% 89.3% 93.2% 0.87
Metal binding histidine
AA 37 30 226 40 48.1% 55.2% 88.3% 79.0% 0.38
BLOSUM62 43 21 235 34 55.8% 67.2% 91.8% 83.5% 0.51
PAM250 39 37 219 38 50.6% 51.3% 85.5% 77.5% 0.36
PSSM 60 13 243 17 77.9% 82.2% 94.9% 91.0% 0.74
PSSM+SAAPs 62 8 248 15 80.5% 88.6% 96.9% 93.1% 0.80