Table 6. Comparison performance with other methods.
Metal binding cysteine | |||||||||
Method | True Positive | False Positive | True Negative | False Negative | Sensitivity | Precision | Specificity | Accuracy | MCC |
Cross-Validation Dataset | |||||||||
Metal Detector | 78 | 26 | 86 | 1 | 98.7% | 75.0% | 76.8% | 85.9% | 0.75 |
ETMB-RBF | 78 | 12 | 100 | 1 | 98.7% | 86.7% | 89.3% | 93.2% | 0.87 |
Independent Test Dataset | |||||||||
Metal Detector | 20 | 8 | 21 | 2 | 90.9% | 71.4% | 72.4% | 80.4% | 0.63 |
ETMB-RBF | 22 | 4 | 25 | 0 | 100% | 84.6% | 86.2% | 92.3% | 0.85 |