Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 6;8(2):e46572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046572

Table 6. Comparison performance with other methods.

Metal binding cysteine
Method True Positive False Positive True Negative False Negative Sensitivity Precision Specificity Accuracy MCC
Cross-Validation Dataset
Metal Detector 78 26 86 1 98.7% 75.0% 76.8% 85.9% 0.75
ETMB-RBF 78 12 100 1 98.7% 86.7% 89.3% 93.2% 0.87
Independent Test Dataset
Metal Detector 20 8 21 2 90.9% 71.4% 72.4% 80.4% 0.63
ETMB-RBF 22 4 25 0 100% 84.6% 86.2% 92.3% 0.85