Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cerebellum. 2013 Apr;12(2):236–244. doi: 10.1007/s12311-012-0418-y

Table 1.

Demographics of sample

Males
Control (n=64) ICLP (n=66) CL/P (n=52) CPO (n=14)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Age (years) 13.04 3.92 13.44 4.61 13.94 4.75 11.60 3.61
SESa 2.31 0.59 2.61 0.57 2.57 0.57 2.79 0.58
Females
Control (n=63) ICLP (n=41) CL/P (n=24) CPO (n=17)
Age (years) 13.65 3.82 14.11 3.80 14.43 3.51 13.66 4.24
SESa 2.29 0.52 2.73 0.74 2.55 0.60 2.97 0.85

ICLP isolated cleft lip and/or palate, CL/P cleft lip with/without cleft palate, CPO cleft palate alone, SES socioeconomic status

a

Parental socioeconomic status was based on a modified Hollingshead scale of 1–5 with the higher number, the lower the status. Difference between controls and all cleft groups for both genders was p<0.01 by Wilcoxon rank sum test