Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Oct 29;41(4):374–384. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12015

Table 2.

Linear regression models depicting the association between oral hygiene categories (with and without selected covariates) and cardiovascular disease risk among disease-free adults in the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (N=712).

Cardiovascular disease risk score (%)

Predictors Crude model Fully adjusted model Reduced model
Intercept 0.076 ±0.006, p<0.001 0.255 ±0.022, p<0.001 0.252 ±0.017, p<0.001

Oral hygiene
    Excellent 0.010 ±0.009, p=0.309 −0.019 ±0.008, p=0.020 –0.018 ±0.007, p=0.015

    Good ref. ref. ref.

    Fair 0.026 ±0.003, p<0.001 0.000 ±0.006, p=0.980 0.000 ±0.006, p=0.960

    Poor 0.043 ±0.019, p=0.028 0.011 ±0.009, p=0.252 0.009 ±0.010, p=0.371

Age (years)
    30–38 --- −0.193 ±0.015, p<0.001 –0.189 ±0.015, p<0.001

    39–47 --- −0.159 ±0.014, p< 0.001 –0.155 ±0.014, p<0.001

    48–56 --- −0.104 ±0.015, p<0.001 –0.102 ±0.014, p<0.001

    57–65 --- −0.059 ±0.015, p=0.001 –0.058 ±0.015, p<0.001

    66–74 --- ref. ref.

Sex
    Female --- −0.073 ±0.006, p<0.001 –0.075 ±0.005, p<0.001

    Male --- ref. ref.

Marital status
    Not married/living with partner --- 0.000 ±0.007, p=0.975 ---

    Married/living with partner --- ref. ---

Education
    Bachelors degree or higher --- 0.002 ±0.007, p=0.721 ---

    Associate degree/some college --- 0.002 ±0.006, p=0.800 ---

    High school or less --- ref. ---

Dental care coverage
    Covered --- 0.002 ±0.007, p=0.785 ---

    Not covered --- ref. ---

Dental check in last year
    Yes --- −0.021 ±0.007, p=0.005 –0.019 ±0.007, p=0.009

    No --- ref. ref.

Smoking
    Current --- 0.063 ±0.008, p<0.001 0.062 ±0.008, p<0.001

    Former --- 0.002 ±0.005, p=0.611 0.002 ±0.005, p=0.622

    Never --- ref. ref.

Saturated fat intake (grams per day) --- 0.000 ±0.001, p=0.649 ---

Sedentary behavior (hours per day) --- −0.002 ±0.001, p=0.120 ---

Values are reported as point estimate ±standard error, p-value. Positive values indicate a greater risk score relative to the reference category (or 1-unit increase for continuous predictor variables) and negative values indicate a lower risk score relative to the reference category.

Bolded values denote point estimate was p < 0.05.

The fully adjusted model includes all examined covariate terms, whereas the reduced model includes only covariate terms that (1) changed the oral hygiene point estimate by >10%, or (2) had p < 0.05 in their adjusted association with cardiovascular disease risk score.