Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;23(1):43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.08.003

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Representation of how the orientation of fascicles within MG influences the patterns of myoelectric activity recorded at different proximal–distal muscle regions. (A) Orientation of fascicles in the proximal muscle region leads to myoelectric activity from different fibres being represented in different channels of the electrode array. Close to the muscle–tendon junction, fascicles are orientated more parallel to the skin, so electrode channels now lie along fascicles and propagation of action potentials will be visible in electrode channels located over the region. (B) Myoelectric activity from one participant recorded during a 2 s period of standing (left panel), with signals from a 50 ms portion of this time (grey block) shown in the right panel. In the right panel signal propagation is visible and highlighted in channels in 11–15, with the motor end plate evident in channel 13.