Table 1.
Study design and reviewed data
| Author | Design | Year | Number of patients | PHS (days) | THS (days) | Morbidity (%) | Readmission (%) | Mortality (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC | ERAS | TC | ERAS | TC | ERAS | TC | ERAS | TC | ERAS | TC | ERAS | |||
| Teewen20 | CCT | 2010 | 122 | 61 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1.6 | 0 | ||||
| Muller18 | RCT | 2009 | 75 | 76 | 10.3 | 6.7 | 49 | 21 | 3 | 4 | ||||
| Serclova19 | RCT | 2009 | 52 | 51 | 10.4 | 7.4 | 48 | 22 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Khoo5 | RCT | 2007 | 35 | 35 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 46 | 26 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 0 |
| Polle13 | CCT | 2007 | 52 | 55 | 6 | 4 | 6.5 | 4 | 31 | 27 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Kariv21 | CCT | 2007 | 97 | 97 | 20 | 24 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Wichmann24 | CCT | 2007 | 20 | 20 | 9.7 | 6.7 | ||||||||
| Gatt4 | RCT | 2005 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 6.6 | 75 | 47 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 5 | ||
| Basse7 | CCT | 2004 | 130 | 130 | 10 | 3.3 | 13 | 5.5 | 55 | 26 | 12 | 21 | 3 | 5 |
| Raue22 | CCT | 2004 | 29 | 23 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Anderson10 | RCT | 2003 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 45 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | ||
| Delaney12 | RCT | 2003 | 33 | 31 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 7.1 | 5.4 | 30 | 23 | 18 | 10 | ||
| Stephen23 | CCT | 2003 | 52 | 86 | 6.6 | 3.7 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 25 | 11 | 2 | 9 | ||
PHS = primary hospital stay; THS = total hospital stay; TC = traditional care; ERAS = enhanced recovery after surgery; CCT = clinical controlled trial; RCT = randomised controlled trial Continuous data variables expressed as a mean