Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 8;108(2):285–291. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.557

Table 4. Predictors of pathological complete response.

  Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Factor ORa 95% CI P-value ORa 95% CI P-value
Age (years)
0.99
0.98–1
0.2
1
0.99–1.01
0.8
Multifocal tumoura
No 1.00 1.00
Yes
0.69
0.48–1
0.05
0.75
0.5–1.12
0.15
Nuclear grade
I 1.00 1.00
II 4.91 0.67–36.14 0.1 2.91 0.38–22.56 0.31
III
20.33
2.81–147.17
0.002
11.26
1.47–86.39
0.01
Baseline T stage
T1–T2 1.00 1.00
T3–T4
0.69
0.51–0.93
0.01
0.65
0.46–0.92
0.01
Baseline N stage
N0 1.00 1.00
N1 or sup
0.73
0.56–0.96
0.02
0.66
0.49–0.9
0.008
Histological subtype
IDC 1.00 1.00
ILC
0.21
0.09–0.47
<0.001
0.5
0.19–1.3
0.1
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen
Taxane basedb 2.67 1.56–4.59 <0.001 2.14 1.2–3.84 0.01
Traztuzumabc 6 4.44–8.12 <0.001 5.03 3.64–6.95 <0.001

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; IDC=invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC=invasive lobular carcinoma; OR=odds ratio; pCR=pathological complete response.

a

OR=1 is the reference; OR<1, factor associated with lower pCR rate; OR>1, factor associated with higher pCR rate.

b

Taxane-based regimen was compared with no taxane-based regimen.

c

Trastuzumab regimen was compared with no trastuzumab regimen.