Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 31;108(2):292–300. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.542

Table 1. Response rates.

  Australia Canada Denmark Norway Sweden UK
Total number of households with connected telephone numbers approached
35 730
46 672
5369
8921
7411
80 210
Number of households of unknown eligibilitya
20 719
34 828
899
1922
1901
55 979
Number of households of known eligibility
15 011
11 844
4470
6999
5510
24 231
Number of households in which the individual declined to take part either during or after assessment of eligibility
433
1195
2337
4726
3345
3468
Number of ineligible householdsa
10 119
8571
12
24
19
13 234
Number of eligible householdsa
4892
3273
4458
6975
5491
10 997
Proportion of households eligible among those assessed for eligibility (%)
32.6
27.6
99.7
99.7
99.7
45.4
Completed interviews
4002
2064
2000
2009
2039
6965
Minimum response rate (%)b
15.9
5.4
31.5
23.2
28.0
10.5
Estimated response rate (%)c 47.4 38.8 31.6 23.0 27.5 40.0
a

A household was eligible if one or more people aged ⩾50 years lived in the household.

b

The minimum response rate represents the response rate assuming all households that we could not assess for eligibility were eligible, in other words the lowest possible response rate. It is calculated as the number of complete interviews divided by the number of interviews plus the number of incomplete interviews among eligible people (refusals and break-offs plus non-contacts) plus the number of all households of unknown eligibility (equivalent to the American Association for Public Opinion Research response rate formula 1).

c

The estimated response rate respresents the response rate after adjusting the size of the denominator for the likely proportion of housholds that were eligible. It is calculated by assuming that the proportion eligible among households of unknown eligibility is the same as the proportion of those tested for eligibility who were eligible (equivalent to American Association for Public Opinion Research response rate formula 3).