Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 15;108(2):420–428. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.549

Table 3. Cox regression analyses for CT cohort (cancer-specific survival).

CT cohort (n=111)
Univariate
Multivariate (global model)
Multivariate (final model)
Variable (characteristics) HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Age at diagnosis (⩽74 vs >74 years)
0.94 (0.53–1.68)
0.84




Gleason score (5–6 vs 7–10)
4.08 (1.72–9.69)
0.001
3.16 (1.08–9.27)
0.036
3.48 (1.20–10.1)
0.021
Endocrine treatment (yes/no)
0.97 (0.54–1.75)
0.93




Microvessel density (continuous)
1.09 (1.05–1.14)
<0.001
1.08 (1.02–1.13)
0.005
1.09 (1.03–1.14)
0.001
VEGF (low vs high)
2.34 (1.28–4.27)
0.006
1.61 (0.76–3.43)
0.213


APN IHC (neg vs pos) 0.17 (0.04–0.72) 0.017 0.27 (0.06–1.19) 0.084 0.23 (0.06–1.00) 0.049

Abbreviations: APN=aminopeptidase N; CI=confidence interval; CT=conservative treatment; HR=hazard ratio; IHC=immunohistochemistry; VEGF=vascular endothelial growth factor.