Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 7;8(2):e55736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055736

Table 7. Relative frequencies (%) of each anomaly typology, in each lot.

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group4
INIT06 LVIT01 INIT07 LVIT02 INIT19 LVIT04 INIT18 LVIT05 INGR01 MEGR04
A1 0.4 0.2 0.6
A2 0.3
A3 1.4
A4 1.4
A5 0.6 0.8 3.1 1.8 4.9 2.8 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.2
A5* 0.3 0.3
B1 0.3 0.7
B2 0.2 0.3 0.7
B3 0.5 5.5 0.3
B4 0.8 0.9 0.3 3.4
B5 0.4 2.0 0.6 2.7 4.8
C1 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.9 1.8
C2 0.2
C3 0.2 0.7 0.3 0.4
C3* 0.2
C4 1.3 1.7 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 1.2 0.3 0.7 1.4
C5 4.4 1.7 3.5 0.3 7.8 5.5 6.9 3.5 1.7 7.9
C5* 0.3 6.7 0.2
C6 4.0 2.1 4.2 8.3 5.2 6.2 4.4 4.6 2.8 4.8
C6* 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2
D1 0.3
D2 0.2
D3 2.3 0.4 0.4 3.6 0.7 1.9 1.5 0.6
D3* 0.4 0.6
D4 5.7 6.8 4.2 2.8 3.6 1.4 5.3 2.1 3.9 2.9
D5 8.0 0.8 3.5 0.6 7.3 2.1 6.2 1.4 0.7 2.8
D5* 1.9 0.7 0.9 0.3 1.3 2.8
D6 10.7 10.6 7.7 1.5 5.2 5.5 3.7 12.1 4.7 2.8
D6* 5.9 17.2 9.4 19.9 3.9 2.8
E8L 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.2
E8R 1.7 0.6 0.3 1.1 0.2
E11L 2.9 0.3 6.4 8.9
E11R 0.2 1.4 2.4 6.7
F8 6.1 0.8 1.3 0.9 2.7 3.4 2.8 3.5 2.2 1.8
F11 0.4 3.8 0.7 1.2 2.7 0.7 2.8 0.3 0.9 0.2
G9 10.9 33.0 19.9 34.8 5.8 2.8 15.3 14.2 30.0 18.1
G9* 2.8 4.8
G10 10.3 14.0 15.0 7.4 8.0 8.3 11.9 13.1 2.2 11.3
G11 6.3 5.3 5.8 1.2 0.7 1.6 2.4 2.8
G26 6.9 3.2
H8 12.2 4.7 0.7 2.5 9.7 11.0 6.6 8.2 1.9 1.8
H11 1.3 1.3 8.0 9.2 1.9 5.4 1.6
I8 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.5 3.2 2.1 1.6 1.4 2.8 1.8
I11 4.8 5.1 0.2 2.1 0.7 0.3 0.3 2.6 1.8
L8R 0.2 0.3
L11L 0.2 0.7 1.5 0.2
L11R 0.2 0.4
12 0.2 0.3
14 0.7 2.8 2.9
15 3.4 4.2 8.4 14.1 0.3 0.4
16 0.2 4.2 1.1 1.2
17L 2.3 0.4 6.0 1.2 1.5 2.2 0.6
17R 1.4 1.2 0.4
17*L 0.3 0.7
17*R 0.2 0.7
18 3.9 4.8 8.4 4.3 0.9 1.2
19 0.2 1.4 0.3
20 0.3
25 0.2
ClL 0.7
ClR 0.5

When the observed value is 0, the cell has been left empty to make reading easier.

Codes in italics highlight severe anomalies; bold digits highlight the highest values of frequency.