Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 7;8(2):e55736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055736

Table 8. Relative frequencies (%) of individuals affected by each anomaly typology, in each lot.

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
INIT06 LVIT01 INIT07 LVIT02 INIT19 LVIT04 INIT18 LVIT05 INGR01 MEGR04
A1 1.5 0.8 1.6
A2 0.9
A3 5.0
A4 5.0
A5 5.4 3.3 11.4 4.9 25.7 7.5 2.9 0.9 0.7 0.8
A5* 0.9 0.9
B1 1.9 2.5
B2 0.8 1.9 2.5
B3 2.9 2.5 0.9
B4 1.5 2.4 1.9 2.5
B5 1.5 4.9 1.6 7.6 5.0
C1 5.4 3.3 0.9 2.9 4.8
C2 0.9
C3 0.9 2.5 0.9 1.6
C3* 0.7
C4 5.4 4.5 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.5 3.9 0.9 3.0 4.8
C5 25.4 6.7 1.6 0.8 35.2 15.0 16.2 7.6 6.7 23.2
C5* 1.9 14.3 0.7
C6 30.0 7.6 13.8 18.8 27.6 2.0 13.3 11.4 1.4 17.5
C6* 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8
D1 1.9
D2 0.8
D3 2.0 1.5 1.6 19.5 2.5 5.7 6.0 2.4
D3* 1.5 2.4
D4 38.2 22.7 13.8 7.4 15.2 2.5 8.6 3.9 8.3 7.9
D5 52.7 3.3 11.4 1.6 35.2 7.5 18.9 3.9 3.0 7.9
D5* 1.5 2.5 2.9 0.9 5.2 7.9
D6 72.7 31.8 23.6 5.0 23.9 17.5 1.5 32.4 17.9 7.9
D6* 33.3 6.0 28.6 53.3 15.7 7.9
E8L 5.7 1.9 2.2 0.8
E8R 9.5 1.9 0.9 3.7 0.8
E11L 10.9 0.9 16.4 21.4
E11R 0.9 2.5 8.3 15.9
F8 36.4 3.3 4.9 2.5 1.5 1.0 8.6 8.6 7.5 5.6
F11 3.6 4.5 2.4 3.3 15.2 2.5 8.6 0.9 3.7 0.8
G9 70.0 87.9 56.9 69.7 32.4 1.0 44.8 34.3 76.1 57.1
G9* 11.2 19.5
G10 83.6 5.0 5.5 18.8 42.9 27.5 36.2 35.2 7.5 37.3
G11 2.0 13.8 5.7 3.9 2.5 4.8 9.0 9.5
G26 26.9 12.7
H8 63.6 13.6 2.4 5.0 45.7 37.5 19.5 2.0 5.2 5.6
H11 2.0 4.5 18.7 17.2 9.5 14.9 6.3
I8 3.6 3.3 5.7 2.5 16.2 7.7 4.8 2.9 5.2 4.0
I11 2.0 10.0 0.8 2.5 3.9 0.9 0.9 8.3 6.3
L8R 0.9 0.9
L11L 0.9 2.5 5.2 0.8
L11R 0.9 0.7
12 1.8 0.8
14 2.4 11.2 11.1
15 30.0 15.1 30.9 37.7 1.9 1.6
16 1.8 15.1 4.6 3.3
17L 16.4 1.5 17.9 3.3 8.6 6.7 2.2
17R 7.6 3.9 1.5
17*L 1.9 2.5
17*R 0.9 2.5
18 21.9 17.5 25.7 11.4 3.7 4.0
19 0.9 5.0 0.9
20 1.9
25 0.8
ClL 3.9
ClR 2.9

When the observed value is 0, the cell has been left empty to make reading easier. Codes in italics highlight severe anomalies; bold digits highlight the highest values of frequency.