Table 6.
Mobility described in the literature of implants restoring more than 5° of segmental mobility
Author | Years | Follow-up | Type of prothesis | L3–L4 ROM | L4–L5 ROM | L5–S1 ROM | Global ROM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gioia [45] | 2007 | 2 | Charité III | 8 | 10.3 | 8 | 8.7 |
Bertagnoli [46] | 2005 | 2 | Prodisc | – | – | – | 6.5 |
Guyer [47] | 2009 | 2 | Charité | – | 6.5 | 6 | 6.3 |
5 | – | 6 | 6.3 | 6.2 | |||
David [48] | 1993 | 1 | Charité | 2 | 9.4 | 6.4 | 5.9 |
Siepe [49] | 2007 | 1 | Charité III | – | 7.2 | 5.9 | 6.5 |
Zigler [50] | 2012 | 5 | Prodisc | – | – | – | 7.7 |
Delamarter [51] | 2011 | 2 | Prodisc-L | 7.8 | 6.2 | 7.0 | |
The present series | 2012 | 2 | LP-ESP | – | 8.2 | 7.6 | 7.9 |