Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Abus. 2003 Sep;24(3):141–156. doi: 10.1080/08897070309511544

Table III.

Oblimin Rotation Factor Pattern for SBI Variables

Item Pattern matrix
I (Competence) II (Lack of role legitimacy) III (Satisfaction working w/ at-risk) IV (Organizational resources) V (Skepticism) VI (Time & compensation)
I know what questions to aska 0.78
I’m comfortable asking about drinkinga 0.74
I don’t know how to identify at-risk drinkers with no obvious signs of excess 0.65
I know how to effectively help patientsa 0.71
I am at ease making these statementsa 0.72
How often do your colleagues screen? 0.60
How do you think your colleagues would feel about you screening patients? 0.85
How do you think your colleagues would feel about you briefly intervening? −0.83
How often do you think your colleagues intervene? −0.68
It is rewarding to work with at-risk drinkersa 0.73
There are no professional benefits 0.46
Problem drinkers are more noncompliant 0.68
My organization is without an intervention protocol 0.67
The plans I contract with reimburse for alc counselinga 0.69
There is no information provided for referring patients 0.70
I’m not aware of a single problem drinker who cut back 0.61
Advising patients to seek assistance is the best I can do 0.61
I’m skeptical of behavioral medicine 0.46
Given adequate information practitioners can help patients reducea 0.72
There is not enough time to advise patientsa 0.61
Patients would not be willing to pay for counseling 0.60
a

Items were recoded for analysis so that 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.