Table 2.
Parameters/ID | 40% | 50% | 60% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S = 30, D = 54, h = 0.2, k = 0.9, V = 1 |
0.415 |
0.415 |
0.462 |
0.493 |
0.538 |
0.571 |
0.605 |
S = 15, D = 26, h = 0.4, k = 0.6, V = 0 |
0.402 |
0.427 |
0.464 |
0.547 |
0.606 |
0.665 |
0.706 |
S = 15, D = 29, h = 0.4, k = 0.6, V = 0 |
0.403 |
0.425 |
0.467 |
0.548 |
0.607 |
0.666 |
0.708 |
S = 12, D = 24, h = 0.5, k = 0.6, V = 0 |
0.351 |
0.359 |
0.461 |
0.571 |
0.640 |
0.691 |
0.765 |
S = 8, D = 15, h = 0.7, k = 1, V = 0 | 0.259 | 0.261 | 0.363 | 0.553 | 0.625 | 0.694 | 0.791 |
The table describes the Matthews Correlation Coefficient of the homopolymer insertion/deletion recovery for various parameter combinations using a 454 model without flowpeak information (i.e. FASTA input). The results are evaluated using alignments against targets of a protein identity ranging from 40 to 100%, not including potential sequencing errors. The best results are highlighted in bold for each column as well as the parameter set which results in the best mean MCC.