Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;13:230. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-230

Table 3.

Parameter evaluation using a 454-model using flowpeak information

Parameters/ID 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
S = 30, D = 60, h = 0.2, k = 0.4, V = 1
0.681
0.682
0.708
0.748
0.775
0.796
0.815
S = 30, D = 60, h = 0.2, k = 0.5, V = 1
0.681
0.683
0.712
0.752
0.782
0.803
0.823
S = 20, D = 40, h = 0.3, k = 0.4, V = 1
0.673
0.677
0.706
0.757
0.788
0.812
0.833
S = 30, D = 60, h = 0.2, k = 0.8, V = 1
0.666
0.671
0.701
0.757
0.791
0.817
0.839
S = 15, D = 30, h = 0.4, k = 0.5, V = 1
0.613
0.629
0.673
0.744
0.782
0.825
0.849
S = 8, D = 15, h = 0.7, k = 0.4, V = 0 0.321 0.317 0.455 0.639 0.697 0.774 0.862

The table describes the Matthews Correlation Coefficient of the homopolymer insertion/deletion recovery for various parameter combinations using flowpeak information (i.e. SFF input). The results are evaluated using alignments against targets of a protein identity ranging from 40 to 100%, not including potential sequencing errors. The best results are highlighted in bold for each column as well as the parameter set which results in the best mean MCC (default parameters).