Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 8;8(2):e55637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055637

Table 1. overview of studies in the pooled analysis (N = 2417).

Study/year Phase Primary endpoint Treatment regimen No.of patients CR+PR (%) PFS, mo OS, mo 1- Year SR (%) Jadad score
Lynch T.J.et al 2009 II ORR Erlotinib/Bortezomib 25 9 1.3 8.5 40 3
Erlotinib 25 16 2.7 7.3 30
Bennouna J. et al 2010 II NR Erlotinib/Everolimus 66 12.1 2.9 NR NR 3
Erlotinib 67 10.4 2.0 NR NR
HerBst, Roy S. et al 2011 III OS Erlotinib/bevacizumab 319 13 3.4 9.3 42.1 5
Erlotinib/placebo 317 6 1.7 9.2 40.7
Sequist L.V. et al. 2011 II PFS Erlotinib/tivantinib 84 10 3.8 8.5 NR 5
Erlotinib/placebo 83 7 2.3 6.9 NR
Spigel D.R. et al. 2011 II ORR and PFS Erlotinib/sorafenib 112 8 3.38 7.62 NR 5
Erlotinib/placebo 56 11 1.94 7.23 NR
Ramalingam S.S. et al. 2011 II PFS Erlotinib/R1507(IGF-1R)weekly 57 8.8 1.6 8.1 NR 5
Erlotinib/R1507(IGF-1R)Q 3 weekly 57 7 2.7 12.1 NR
Erlotinib/placebo 57 8.8 1.5 8.1 NR
Scagliotti G.V. et al. 2011 III OS Erlotinib/sunitinib 480 10.6 3.6 9.0 NR 5
Erlotinib/placebo 480 6.9 2.0 8.5 NR
Witta S.E.et al. 2012 II OS Erlotinib/Entinostat 67 3.0 1.97 8.9 NR 5
Erlotinib/placebo 65 9.2 1.88 6.7 NR

Abbreviations: OS: overall survival; ORR: overall response rate; PFS: progression-free survival; CR: complete response; PR: partial response; 1-year SR: 1-year survival rate; NR: not reported.