Table 2. Logistic Regression Analyses Predicting26 year Outcomes.

	Global Adjustment Good or Better				Educational Attainment High School Diploma or Better				Work Ethic Good or Better				Romantic Relationships Regular Involvement in long-term relationships
	B	SE	p- value	OR	B	SE	p- value	OR	B	SE	p- value	OR	B	SE	p- value	OR
Adolescence SU Groups
Experimenters (n = 58)  vs. Abstainers (n = 18)	.86	.68	.203	2.36	2.18	.81	.007	8.83	.63	.62	.308	1.88	1.07	.61	.081	2.92
Experimenters (n = 58)  vs. At-Risk (n = 58)	1.41	.52	.007	4.08	.91	.75	.223	2.48	.74	.44	.093	2.10	1.17	.45	.009	3.23
Experimenters (n = 58)  vs. Abusers (n = 25)	1.24	.69	.072	3.45	1.60	.83	.054	4.93	1.40	.69	.041	4.04	1.06	.61	.083	2.89
Sex
Female vs. Male	.41	.45	.361	1.52	−.16	.59	.789	.85	.45	.41	.279	1.56	.49	.41	.227	1.64
IQ	.07	.02	.000	1.07	.03	.02	.066	1.04	.03	.01	.023	1.03	−.02	.01	.272	.99
Int. 16 yrs	−.00	.03	.970	1.00	−.02	.04	.532	.98	−.02	.03	.442	.98	.04	.03	.134	1.04
Ext. 16 yrs	−.02	.03	.552	.98	−.04	.03	.220	.96	−.00	.03	.955	1.00	−.04	.02	.119	.96
Parental Monitoring 16 yrs	.15	.39	.703	1.16	.92	.51	.071	2.51	.59	.38	.121	1.80	−.40	.35	.248	.67
Peer Competence 16 yrs	.02	.01	.016	1.02	.03	.01	.023	1.03	.01	.01	.109	1.01	.01	.01	.247	1.01
Current SU 26 yrs	−.50	.18	.006	.61	−.09	.19	.623	.92	−.25	.16	.127	.78	−.09	.15	.553	.92

Note: OR = Odds Ratio; SU = Substance Use.