Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Jan 6;31(2):160–165. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2458

Figure 2.

Figure 2

In silico predictions and experimental measures of H2O2 and O2 levels. (a) Predicted H2O2 levels of various mutants compared to wildtype. Blue designates strains whose mean H2O2 production levels were simulated to be >5% higher than wildtype over both ensembles, whereas yellow designates strains whose mean H2O2 production levels were simulated to be <5% higher than wildtype over both ensembles. (b) Predicted O2 levels of various mutants compared to wildtype. Blue designates strains whose mean O2 production levels were simulated to be >5% higher than wildtype over both ensembles, whereas yellow designates strains whose mean O2 production levels were simulated to be <5% higher than wildtype over both ensembles. (c) Experimentally measured relative fluorescence/OD600 of strains with the H2O2-sensitive reporter (dps promoter-gfp). Blue designates strains that were experimentally measured to have increased levels of H2O2 compared with wildtype (P-value < 0.05), whereas yellow designates strains that were experimentally measured to have levels of H2O2 that do not exceed those of wildtype. (d) Experimentally measured relative fluorescence/OD600 of strains with the O2-sensitive reporter (soxS promoter-gfp). Blue designates strains that were experimentally measured to have increased levels of O2 compared with wildtype (P-value < 0.05), whereas yellow designates strains that were experimentally measured to have levels of O2 that do not exceed those of wildtype. * denotes genes that are essential in our media conditions. Grey denotes genes that were not experimentally examined (for consistency between diagrams, these genes were also denoted by grey in a and b, although in silico predictions were computed).