Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar;42(3):1048–1057. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1048-1057.2004

TABLE 3.

Comparison of results obtained by on-chip PCR identification and conventional bacteriology for 21 clinical samples

Result by on-chip PCR No. (%) of samples by on-chip PCR Result by conventional bacteriology No. of samples by conventional bacteriology;
Congruent results 47 (82.5)
    Identical identification 21
        Staphylococcus spp. 7 Staphylococcus spp. 3
Coagulase-positive staphylococci 4
        Staphylococcus aureus 2 Coagulase-positive staphylococci 2
        Streptococcus equi 5 Streptococcus equi 3
Beta-hemolytic Streptococcus sp. 1
Streptococcus spp. 1
        Escherichia coli 6 Escherichia coli 6
        Bacillus spp. 1 Aerobic spore-forming bacteria 1
    Not represented (true negative) 26 Alpha-hemolytic Streptococcus sp. 7
Streptococcus spp. 1
Aerobic spore-forming bacteria 5
Neisseria spp. 2
Acinetobacter spp. 5
Coryneform bacteria 6
Conflicting results 10 (17.5)
    On-chip PCR failure (false negative) 4 Staphylococcus aureus 1
Coagulase-positive staphylococci 2
Streptococcus equi 1
    No identical identification 6
        No fluorescence signal 1 Pantoea agglomerans 1
        Enterobacter spp. 2 No growth 2
        Streptococcus equi 2 No growth 2
        Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1 No growth 1