Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar;42(3):1214–1219. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1214-1219.2004

TABLE 3.

Detection of malaria parasites by various methods

Malaria-causing speciesa Organism(s) detected by each method (no. of samples)
Microscopy Real-time PCR Nested PCR Genomic sequence analysisb
P. falciparum P. falciparum (43) P. falciparum (41) P. falciparum (41) P. falciparum (41)
P. ovale (1) P. ovale (1) P. ovale (1)
P. falciparum + P. ovale (1) P. falciparum + P. ovale (1) P. falciparum + P. ovale (1)
Non-P. falciparum P. falciparum or P. vivax (1) P. ovale (1) P. ovale (1) P. ovale (1)
Plasmodium spp. (1) P. falciparum + P. ovale (1) P. falciparum + P. ovale + P. malariae (1) P. falciparum + P. ovalec (1)
P. vivax (11) P. vivax (7) P. vivax (7) P. vivax (7)
P. ovale (4) P. ovale (4) P. ovale (4)
P. malariae (2) Negative (2) P. malariae (2) P. malariaed (2)
P. ovale (3) P. ovale (2) P. ovale (2) P. ovale (2)
P. vivax (1) P. vivax (1) P. vivax (1)
Negative Negative (61) P. falciparum (1) P. falciparum (1) P. falciparum (1)
Negative (60) Negative (60) Negative (60)
    Total 122 122 122 122
a

Malaria species are classified according to the diagnosis obtained from the blood slide examination.

b

Sequences were obtained for all the PCR products resulting from both amplification methods, except for the two P. malariae-positive samples. The sequences were the same in all cases and confirmed the species diagnosis.

c

Genomic sequence analysis was not carried out.

d

Genomic sequence analysis was only performed for the nested PCR amplification product.