Table 2.
RT effect broken down by inactivations of LIPd or LIPv and by movement direction
Saccade, ms (SEM) |
Reach, ms (SEM) |
|||
Area | Coordinated | Dissociated | Coordinated | Dissociated |
LIPd (n = 22) | ||||
All | 6.1 (2.2)* | 6.7 (1.5)* | 10.8 (2.8)* | −0.3 (1.2) |
Contralateral | 6.8 (1.7)* | 8.3 (1.2)* | 10.7 (2.2)* | −0.7 (1.3) |
Ipsilateral | 4.7 (1.3)* | 5.1 (1.1)* | 11.4 (2.5)* | −1.6 (1.4) |
LIPv (n = 20) | ||||
All | 4.7 (2.3)* | 4.6 (1.6)* | 5.4 (4.4) | 0.3 (1.4) |
Contralateral | 8.4 (1.7)* | 7.0 (1.5)* | 7.6 (3.2)* | 1.3 (1.5) |
Ipsilateral | 1.2 (1.6) | −0.4 (1.3) | 0.0 (3.4) | 1.4 (1.2) |
Topmost and bottommost targets along midline were included only in “all.”
*P < 0.05, two-tailed t test.