Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 22;110(6):2371–2376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220508110

Table 2.

RT effect broken down by inactivations of LIPd or LIPv and by movement direction

Saccade, ms (SEM)
Reach, ms (SEM)
Area Coordinated Dissociated Coordinated Dissociated
LIPd (n = 22)
 All 6.1 (2.2)* 6.7 (1.5)* 10.8 (2.8)* −0.3 (1.2)
 Contralateral 6.8 (1.7)* 8.3 (1.2)* 10.7 (2.2)* −0.7 (1.3)
 Ipsilateral 4.7 (1.3)* 5.1 (1.1)* 11.4 (2.5)* −1.6 (1.4)
LIPv (n = 20)
 All 4.7 (2.3)* 4.6 (1.6)* 5.4 (4.4) 0.3 (1.4)
 Contralateral 8.4 (1.7)* 7.0 (1.5)* 7.6 (3.2)* 1.3 (1.5)
 Ipsilateral 1.2 (1.6) −0.4 (1.3) 0.0 (3.4) 1.4 (1.2)

Topmost and bottommost targets along midline were included only in “all.”

*P < 0.05, two-tailed t test.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure