Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jun 5;25(8):842–854.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.05.004

Table 9.

Comparison of 3-beat averaged mean and median of median % error for all variables.

Mean (median) of % error
Variable

type
Local vs. core

observer %

error (119

variables)
Core lab

inter-

observer %

error (119

variables)
Core lab

inter-

observer

% error
Core lab

intra-

observer %

error
P-value

(local/core vs.

core inter-

observer %

error)*
P-value

(core inter- vs.

core intra-

observer %

error)
A 9.7 (7.3) 6.8 (5.1) 6.8 (5.1) 1.5 (0.9) <.001 <.001
C2 13.6 (8.4) 10.1 (6.7) 10.0 (7.0) 4.6 (2.5) <.001 <.001
C3 20.8 (12.9) 13.1 (9.7) 14.4 (10.9) 5.8 (3.7) <.001 <.001
C4 22.2 (16.5) 18.8 (13.4) 18.8 (14.0) 8.4 (5.2) <.001 <.001
D 13.2 (7.9) 8.7 (5.2) 8.7 (5.2) 4.2 (2.1) <.001 <.001
I 19.1 (5.2) 5.5 (3.9) 5.5 (3.9) 3.9 (2.4) <.001 0.018
S 35.9 (27.5) 40.5 (38.6) 40.5 (38.6) 19.9 (16.3) 0.004 <.001
T 10.8 (5.1) 8.9 (4.4) 8.9 (4.4) 5.5 (2.5) <.001 <.001
V 9.9 (5.6) 6.2 (4.3) 6.2 (4.3) 4.2 (2.7) <.001 <.001
R 4.0 (1.9) 2.9 (1.6) 3.2 (1.6) 2.0 (0.8) <.001 <.001

These have been classified using the schema detailed in the text, where A = area; C2, C3, C4 = calculated from 2, 3 and 4 variables respectively; D = dimension; I = integral; S = slope; T = Doppler time interval; V = velocity, and R = heart rate. Local vs. core, core lab inter-observer and core lab intra-observer % error have been calculated for all classes of variables. Percent error statistics are based on data from 150 variables unless otherwise noted.

*

Local vs. Core lab observer %error vs. Core lab inter-observer %error based on 119 variables

Core lab inter-observer vs. Core lab intra-observer %error based on 150 variables