Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: World J Surg. 2011 Jun;35(6):1345–1354. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1074-y

Table 2.

Patient, tumor, liver-directed surgery, and postoperative characteristics of the 52 patients who underwent surgical management of their liver metastasis

Variable No. of patients (%)(n = 52)
Patient characteristics
 Race, Caucasian 47 (90)
 Median age at surgery [range] (years) 60 [40–85]
Hepatic metastasis
 Presentation, synchronous 23 (46)
 Number of lesions, multiple 2 [1]
 Size of largest liver lesion median [range] (cm) 3 [1–10.5]
 Distribution of liver lesions, bilobar 13 (25)
 Location of liver lesions
  Capsular/implant 20 (38)
  Deeply situated/parenchymal 32 (62)
 CA-125, >250 U/ml 15 (29)
 Concurrent extrahepatic disease 44 (85)
Details of liver-directed surgery
 Surgical approach
  Open 31 (60)
  Laparoscopic 21 (40)
 Median number of tumors treated [range] 2 [18]
 Type of liver-directed therapy
  Resection only 46 (88)
  Radiofrequency ablation only 2 (4)
  Both 4 (8)
 Type of liver resection
  Nonanatomic wedge resection/single segment 30 (58)
  Bisegmentectomy 14 (27)
  Hemihepatectomy 8 (15)
 Extent of resection
  Minor (<3 segments) 44 (85)
  Major (≥ 3 segments) 8 (15)
 Concurrent lymphadenectomy 29 (56)
 Concurrent peritoneal debulking 45 (87)
 Median estimated blood loss [range] (ml) 600 [50–2900]
 Median units of blood transfusion [range] 2 [0–7]
 Margin
  R0 33 (63)
  R1 8 (15)
  R2 1 (2)
  Unknown 10 (19)
Postoperative course
 Median length of stay median (days) 7 [324]
 Grade of complications
  None 24 (46)
  I 4 (8)
  II 5 (10)
  III 8 (15)
  IV 2 (4)
  V 0
  Unknown 9 (17)
Perioperative treatment
 Preoperative chemotherapy 14 (27)
 Preoperative radiotherapy 0
 Postoperative chemotherapy 45 (87)
 Postoperative radiotherapy 2 (4)