Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2012 Nov 8;287(3):563–570. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2589-7

Table 3.

Relationships between MRP2 expression and clinicopathological factors (ANOVA rank test of Kruskal–Wallis, Spearman’s rank correlation)

Studied parameter	MRP2 in the nuclear envelope	MRP2 in the plasma membrane
Age^a	P = 0.8407	P = 0.5067
Age^a	R = 0.02444	R = −0.0807
FIGO	H (9, N = 70) = 18.14576	H (9, N = 70) = 11.51831
FIGO	P = 0.0319	P = 0.3303
Grade	H (9, N = 70) = 0.2527233	H (9, N = 70) = 1.140207
Grade	P = 0.8813	P = 0.5655
Histology	H (9, N = 70) = 4.338052	H (9, N = 70) = 3.603356
Histology	P = 0.3622	P = 0.4624
Progression of the disease	H (9, N = 70) = 7.075123	H (9, N = 70) = 0.6623821
Progression of the disease	P = 0.0078	P = 0.6841
Death of the patient	H (9, N = 70) = 29.39694	H (9, N = 70) = 0.1655955
Death of the patient	P = 0.00001	P = 0.5993

^aSpearman’s rank correlation