Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 6;13:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-111

Table 4.

Relationship of socio-demographic variables and social-psychological factors with the daughters’ HPV vaccination intention

Variables Univariate simple regression analysis among 75% of the daughters (n = 482)
Multivariate backward regression analysis among 75% of the daughters (n = 452)
Multivariate backward regression analysis among 25% of the daughters (n = 147)
Mean (standard deviation) or percentage Association1 Beta (standard error) Standardized Beta Beta (standard error) Standardized Beta
HPV vaccination uptake
 
.35**
0.36 (0.14)
.09*
0.92 (0.25)
.23**
Has not received three HPV-injections (reference)
52
 
 
 
 
 
Has received three HPV-injections
48
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sample
 
.00
0.15 (0.13)
.04
0.11 (0.23)
.03
Praeventis (reference)
64
 
 
 
 
 
Online panel
36
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Socio-demographic variables
 
 
 
 
 
 
Age
13.51 (0.51)
.00
 
 
 
 
Educational level daughter
 
.00
 
 
 
 
Low (reference)
59%
 
 
 
 
 
Intermediate
41%
 
0.22 (0.12)
.06
−0.11 (0.21)
-.03
Highest completed level of education of parents
 
.00
 
 
 
 
Low (reference)
22%
 
 
 
 
 
Intermediate
32%
 
0.08 (0.15)
.02
0.18 (0.24)
.04
High
46%
 
0.04 (0.15)
.01
0.31 (0.23)
.08
Country of birth mother
 
.00
 
 
 
 
The Netherlands (reference)
74%
 
 
 
 
 
Surinam/Antilles
7%
 
0.05 (0.24)
.01
0.08 (0.41)
.01
Turkey/Morocco
15%
 
−0.09 (0.19)
-.02
0.25 (0.34)
.04
Other
4%
 
0.08 (0.26)
.01
−1.18 (0.45)
-.13
Country of birth daughter
 
.00
 
 
 
 
The Netherlands (reference)
92%
 
 
 
 
 
Surinam/Antilles
2%
 
−0.74 (0.43)
-.05
−0.03 (0.59)
−0.00
Turkey/Morocco
3%
 
0.21 (0.33)
.02
-
-
Other
3%
 
0.35 (0.33)
.03
1.62 (0.56)
.13*
Protestant religion
 
.02*
 
 
 
 
No (reference)
82%
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
19%
 
0.02 (0.13)
.00
−0.15 (0.23)
-.03
Social psychological variables
 
 
 
 
 
 
Knowledge about the HPV vaccination
3.59 (2.41)
.00
 
 
 
 
Risk perception (having received no HPV vaccination)
−0.61 (1.39)
.23**
0.19 (0.04)
.13**
 
 
Risk perception (having received the HPV vaccination)
−1.49 (1.22)
.00
 
 
 
 
Attitude towards the HPV vaccination
2.43 (6.02)
.62**
0.12 (0.01)
.37**
0.14 (0.03)
.39**
Negative outcome expectations of the HPV vaccination
5.66 (4.71)
.09**
 
 
 
 
Positive outcome expectations of the HPV vaccination
−1.02 (4.17)
.10**
 
 
 
 
Anticipated regret about rejecting the HPV vaccination
3.24 (1.43)
.27**
 
 
0.24 (0.08)
.17*
Anticipated regret about receiving the vaccination
3.11 (1.52)
.09**
 
 
 
 
Beliefs about the HPV vaccination
2.11 (8.31)
.47**
0.05 (0.01)
.21**
 
 
Relative effectiveness of the HPV vaccination
−2.45 (2.61)
.36**
 
 
 
 
Ambivalence towards the HPV vaccination decision
−0.11 (4.64)
.00
 
 
 
 
Confidence in authorities involved in the HPV vaccination
1.46 (3.49)
.29**
 
 
 
 
Subjective norms towards the HPV vaccination
13.87 (18.60)
.46**
0.02 (0.00)
.15**
0.03 (0.01)
.23*
Descriptive norms towards the HPV vaccination
4.51 (1.42)
.11**
 
 
 
 
Self-efficacy expectations towards the HPV vaccination
1.43 (4.70)
.06**
 
 
 
 
HPV vaccination information processing
1.00 (3.16)
.03**
 
 
 
 
Habit strength towards the HPV vaccination
−0.28 (3.02)
.32**
0.08 (0.02)
.12**
 
 
Decisional conflict about the HPV vaccination – value clarity
1.92 (3.99)
.02*
 
 
 
 
Decisional conflict about the HPV vaccination – certainty
2.06 (4.12)
.01
 
 
 
 
Opinion about alternative medicine
−0.28 (1.65)
.00
 
 
 
 
Past experience of the mother with cervical cancer
 
.00
 
 
 
 
No (reference)
98%
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
2%
 
 
 
 
 
Past experience of the mother with other cancer forms
 
.00
 
 
 
 
No (reference)
96%
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
4%
 
 
 
 
 
Past experience of the mother with abnormal pap smear
 
.00
 
 
 
 
No (reference)
92%
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
8%
 
 
 
 
 
Past experience of someone from the close environment with cervical cancer
 
.00
 
 
 
 
No (reference)
87%
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
13%
 
 
 
 
 
Past experience of someone from the close environment with other cancer forms
 
.00
 
 
 
 
No (reference)
22%
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
78%
 
 
 
 
 
Past experience of someone from the close environment with abnormal pap smear
 
.01
 
 
 
 
No (reference)
86%
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
14%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Model fit for multivariate models
 
 
 
 
 
 
R2 of HPV vaccination uptake
 
 
 
.36
 
.49
R2 change of HPV vaccination uptake
 
 
 
.36
 
.49
F change of HPV vaccination uptake
 
 
 
257.28**
 
137.34**
R2 of HPV vaccination uptake + sample
 
 
 
.36
 
.49
R2 change of HPV vaccination uptake + sample
 
 
 
.00
 
.00
F change of HPV vaccination uptake + sample
 
 
 
0.16
 
0.58
R2 of HPV vaccination uptake + sample + socio-demographic variables
 
 
 
.38
 
.54
R2 change of HPV vaccination uptake + sample + socio-demographic variables
 
 
 
.02
 
.05
F change of HPV vaccination uptake + sample + socio-demographic variables
 
 
 
1.41
 
1.54
R2 of HPV vaccination uptake + sample + socio-demographic + social-psychological variables
 
 
 
.73
 
.77
R2 change of HPV vaccination uptake + sample + socio-demographic + social-psychological variables
 
 
 
.34
 
.24
F change of HPV vaccination uptake + sample + socio-demographic + social-psychological variables       109.17**   45.91**

Notes 1) R**2; Mothers received questions about the HPV vaccination of their daughter, whereas daughters answered questions about the HPV vaccination of themselves; *p < .01; **p < .001.