Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):1–9. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00002

Table 2.

Mean Roland Disability Questionnaire and symptom bothersomeness scores and pairwise comparisons by treatment group and time since randomization

Mean (95% CI)
Between-Group Differences
Primary Outcomes Structural Massage Relaxation Massage Usual Care Omnibus p-value Structural-Usual Care Relaxation-Usual Care Structural-Relaxation
Adjusted analysis§
Roland Disability Questionnaire
  10 weeks 6.5 (5.8, 7.2) 6 (5.3, 6.8) 9 (8.2, 9.8) <0.001 -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4) -2.9 (-4, -1.8) 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
  26 weeks 6.7 (6, 7.5) 6.4 (5.5, 7.2) 8.2 (7.3, 9) 0.007 -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3) -1.8 (-3, -0.6) 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
  52 weeks 7.2 (6.4, 7.9) 6 (5.2, 6.9) 7.4 (6.6, 8.3) 0.049 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9) -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2) 1.1 (0.02, 2.2)
Bothersomeness
  10 weeks 3.8 (3.5, 4.2) 3.5 (3.2, 3.9) 5.2 (4.8, 5.6) <.001 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8) -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2) 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
  26 weeks 4.2 (3.9, 4.5) 4.3 (3.9, 4.7) 4.6 (4.2, 5) 0.31 -- -- --
  52 weeks 4.6 (4.2, 5) 3.9 (3.5, 4.3) 4.2 (3.8, 4.6) 0.097 -- -- --

Wald p-value.

§

Estimates adjusted for baseline value of outcome, age group, sex, baseline Roland Disability Questionnaire and bothersomeness score, education, body mass index, physical work demands, original cause of pain, days cut down on usual activities and medication use.

Note: Between group comparisons were only calculated if the omnibus p-value was <0.05 following the Least Significant Difference approach to control for multiple comparisons.