. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Aging Ment Health. 2012 Sep 4;17(2):197–206. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2012.717252

Table 4.

The Relation of Ratings of Amount of Coverage in Sessions of Each Treatment Domain (Counselors’ and Raters’ Ratings) by Level of Assigned Intervention

	Domain 1	Domain 2	Domain 3

	Counselor Raters	Counselor Raters	Counselor Raters
Assigned Intervention Level	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)
Low	2.00^a /4.00^a	2.50 (3.6) / 1.25 (1.0)	5.10 (1.7)^b/ 2.00 (0.9)^b
Medium	10.43 (4.8) / 7.10 (4.7)	6.50 (1.5)^b / 7.80 (4.0)	4.50 (1.4)^b ^c/ 2.01 (1.5)
High	12.47 (5.8) / 9.40 (2.5)	11.70 (1.1)^b /8.30 (2.7)	14.40 (1.7) ^b ^c/3.60 (1.1)^b
Effect sizes	0.13/ 0.15	0.27/ 0.23	0.42/ 0.35

Note.

There was only one subject for this cell.

Tukey’s posthoc test showed a significant difference (p < .05) between the low and high level groups.

Tukey’s posthoc test showed a significant difference (p < .05) between the medium and high Level groups.